Typing that title made me feel weird, but the truth is that we are getting close enough to ZF2 (at least in Release Candidate form) to be released, so for posterity’s sake I will start differentiating between 1.x and 2. Makes me feel better at either rate.
Before I continue, I want to thank Giorgio Sironi for his very helpful blog post about clever mock objects that showed me the technical details on solving my particular problem, along with @elazar and @onyxraven for their suggestions.
I needed to test a remote web service for an application at work. Right away I knew I wanted to use Test Doubles to do it. I wanted to create a mock object to represent the web service I needed to speak too, and create some data fixtures containing known responses to queries so that I could test the code without speaking to the web service itself. A key feature of a unit test is that it should (unless not avoidable) never connect to a web service or a database. Those sort of things are probably better suited as either components tests or acceptance tests. I’m no testing expert, but that is an approach that seems to resonate with me.
The problem I ran into was that one of the web service calls would react differently depending on what parameter is was passed into. Reading the existing PHPUnit documentation did not provide me with enough hints on how to solve this particular problem, so while I dug around duckduckgoing for a solution I asked Twitter for help. One blog post and 3 tweets later, I had the underpinnings for my test. Check it out here
A walk-through is probably required in order to explain what I did.
First, we create a mock object using the Mock Builder interface and map it to the web service object we wanted to use. Then, I loaded in the fixture data I wanted to use, and also populated two arrays that are a critical part of determining which response to return based on the parameter passed in. Finally, I create an expectation object for the ‘get’ method I am trying to test, telling it that I am stubbing out 3 request-and-response pairings. Then I pass the excpectation object and the two arrays containing acceptable parameters and responses into a different method so that it figures out how to handle my request for that method. It took me a while to get this model working in my head to the point where I could explain it.
To make things even easier to test, I created a Client object that accepts an instance of the web service as a parameter, thereby using Dependency Injection / Inversion of Control to make it possible to actually test this thing. Doing it this way, the Client really has no idea that it is in fact talking to a mock web service instead of a real one. All it does know is that it is getting back JSON responses from this “web service”, and the code takes care of the rest.