<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Way Of Judging Frameworks:  Where are the tests?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/</link>
	<description>Facebook should&#039;ve be written in unicornSchemaLang, because everyone *knows* that PHP is no good for anything, right?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:04:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Un nuovo metro per valutare i framework: dove sono i test? : phpblog.it</title>
		<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-10824</link>
		<dc:creator>Un nuovo metro per valutare i framework: dove sono i test? : phpblog.it</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/?p=324#comment-10824</guid>
		<description>[...] alla faccenda mi preme segnalare un nuovo punto di vista per affrontare il problema della valutazione di un framework proposto da Chr... che sul suo blog parla per esperienza diretta data dall&#8217;ultimo progetto su cui sta lavorando. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alla faccenda mi preme segnalare un nuovo punto di vista per affrontare il problema della valutazione di un framework proposto da Chr&#8230; che sul suo blog parla per esperienza diretta data dall&#8217;ultimo progetto su cui sta lavorando. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hartjes&#8217; Blog: A New Way Of Judging Frameworks: Where are the tests? : Dragonfly Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-10820</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hartjes&#8217; Blog: A New Way Of Judging Frameworks: Where are the tests? : Dragonfly Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/?p=324#comment-10820</guid>
		<description>[...] this new post to his blog Chris Hartjes suggests a new way to judge frameworks - how easy they make it to write [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this new post to his blog Chris Hartjes suggests a new way to judge frameworks &#8211; how easy they make it to write [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Story</title>
		<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-10819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/?p=324#comment-10819</guid>
		<description>I would hope that the people behind Code Ignitor have some unit tests tucked away.  It would be pretty careless of them to not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would hope that the people behind Code Ignitor have some unit tests tucked away.  It would be pretty careless of them to not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hartjes</title>
		<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-10817</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hartjes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/?p=324#comment-10817</guid>
		<description>@Fabien

Thanks for filling in the missing details.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Fabien</p>
<p>Thanks for filling in the missing details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabien</title>
		<link>http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/2008/10/09/a-new-way-of-judging-frameworks-where-are-the-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-10816</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard/?p=324#comment-10816</guid>
		<description>symfony has its own testing framework since the beginning (3 years ago). symfony itself has more than 8800 unit tests, which represents a 80% coverage of the code base.

We also have one of the more powerful functional testing framework, which simulates a browser and allows the developer to introspect all the objects between requests (http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_2/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>symfony has its own testing framework since the beginning (3 years ago). symfony itself has more than 8800 unit tests, which represents a 80% coverage of the code base.</p>
<p>We also have one of the more powerful functional testing framework, which simulates a browser and allows the developer to introspect all the objects between requests (<a href="http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_2/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing" rel="nofollow">http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_2/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
